Thursday, January 22, 2009

Science!! Blowing You Mind In 2009

Almost all commercially produced liquid biofuels come from either sugary crops like sugar beet or cane, or starchy ones like potatoes or corn. But every acre used to cultivate those crops uses one that could grow food - potentially causing food shortages and pushing up prices.

Using woody material instead of crops could sidestep this to some extent by using biomass from more unproductive land. And producing biofuels from freshwater algae cultivated in outdoor ponds or tanks could also use land unsuitable for agriculture. But neither approach has been made commercially available.

Now a group at the Korea Institute of Technology in South Korea has developed a way to use seaweed to produce bioethanol and avoid taking up land altogether.

The group says seaweed has a number of advantages over land-based biomass. It grows much faster, allowing up to six harvests per year; unlike trees and plants, it does not contain lignin and so requires no pre-treatment before it can be turned into fuel; and it absorbs up to seven times as much carbon dioxide from the atmosphere as wood.

The group's patent suggests treating all sizes of algae - from large kelp to single-celled spirulina - with an enzyme to break them into simple sugars, which can then be fermented into ethanol.

The resulting seaweed biofuel is cheaper and simpler to produce than crop or wood-based fuels, and will have no effect on the price of food, says the group.

Click the hyperlink to read the full
biofuels from marine algae patent application. Even though it can be kind of tough to wade through, it's worth it because the invention is awesome and I'll bet dollars to doughnuts that in 20 years this is where all our energy comes from.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

The net energy of corn based ethanol products (i.e. the energy it takes to produce vs the energy ethanol generates) is negative. It is a bull shit alternative and the US government is using it to prop up their agricultural sector. As everybody knows sugar cane has a ridiculously superior yield and is net energy positive. Unfortunately the US gov puts a massive tariff on imported sugarcane ethanol (while simultaneously letting foreign sources of oil from the likes of awesome countries such as Saudia Aribia come in gratis). Having said that, destroying millions of acres of rain forest to produce sugar cane farms isn’t the way forward either.

Conclusion: we are all f’ed…and need a green revolution if anything is going to change….Grimes get on this

J. Blain, Esquire

Anonymous said...

Regarding the accompanying algae proposal, and without performing any of the appropriate research, I am again somewhat unconvinced. Doesn’t seem to have the scope needed to, as you suggest, provide the majority of our energy. First and foremost, in order to increase the efficiency and prevalence of renewable sources within the system, power grids in general need to be revamped, reengineered and/or rethought out. The North American system is so unorganized/decentralized/inefficient that it would take trillions and a decade to sort it out. Seems like a nice idea but on a macro level we need a more intelligent and muscular design

J Blain IV, Esquire

Anonymous said...

Lastly, Grimes is a joke….a handsome joke at that….but a joke nonetheless

Sir J. Blain IV, Esquire

gritz said...

Well at least we can all agree on that last point